Mindless and Obeying
Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 features a fictional and futuristic fireman named Guy Montag. As a fireman. Montag does non set out fires. Alternatively. he starts them in order to fire books and. fundamentally. cognition to the human race. He does non hold any 2nd ideas about his duty until he meets seventeen-year-old Clarisse McClellan. She reveals many admirations of the universe to Montag and causes him to rethink what he is making in firing books. After his negotiations with her. the society’s obeisance to the jurisprudence that bans cognition. thought. and creativeness besides progressively distresses him. In Fahrenheit 451. Ray Bradbury shows conformance in the futuristic America through schooling. leisure. and fear.
The kids in the society are ne’er really taught during school hours. Captain Beatty. another fireman. Tells Montag that the schools ” Cram them full of non-combustible informations. chock them so damned full of “facts” they feel stuffed. but perfectly “brilliant” with information” ( 61 ) . The “teachers” ( really movie ) stuff the pupils with “knowledge” . doing them experience smart. but they are ne’er taught to oppugn any of the information or organize their ain sentiment on affairs. Clarisse says. “Do you know. we ne’er ask inquiries. or at least most don’t ; they merely run the replies at you. bing. bing. bing. and us sitting at that place for four more hours of film-teacher” ( 29 ) . In being taught non to oppugn anything. including the jurisprudence. instruction supports conformance. In a similar manner. amusement encourages obeisance every bit good.
In the civilization that Montag lives in. it is expected in everyone to take part in the civilization’s amusement beginnings: mindless telecasting. the “shell” . and violent games. Television ( a. k. a. parlour walls ) are made up of a level screen on a wall ; sometimes it fills all of the walls alternatively of merely one. and is made up of fast-moving. mindless flashing images of people known as the “family” . Every 2nd they are on. they are shouting bunk. Faber. Montag’s wise man. says. “The televisor is “real” . It is immediate. it as dimension.
It tells you what to believe and blasts it in. It must be right. it seems to be right. It rushes you on so rapidly to its ain decisions your head hasn’t clip to protest” ( 109 ) . The occupants are provided with excessively much “excitement” at one clip and do non hold adequate clip or infinite in their heads to believe. The walls are hooking. Therefore. more people take more clip to sit down and watch the “family” instead than concentrating on developing their ain creativeness and thought. Whenever citizens are off the parlour walls. they listen to the “shell” which is based on the same construct of the parlour walls: to restrict ideas. The lone difference between the two is that the shell is far more compact. Otherwise. the two are similar. In restricting entree to clip for feelings. telecasting and the “shell” promotes conformance to the jurisprudence.
Games in the society work in a comparable manner as the parlour walls and the “shell” . They show aggression and Gore in every individual one of them ; whether or non it is a existent life game or a video game. Sing so much force numbs their heads to all of the occurrences around them. Clarisse references. “I’m afraid of kids my ain age. They kill each other. Make it ever used to be that manner? My uncle says no. Six of my friends have been shot in the last twelvemonth entirely. Ten of them died in auto wrecks” ( 30 ) . Even if mass race murder were go oning around them. they would brush it off like shooing off fly. Being apathetic. they would non oppugn anything go oning around them. which encourages conformance to the authorities. Reinforcing amusement and instruction. fright produces a unfailing obeisance in the society.
Even though most citizens are brainwashed by their schooling and leisure. some. like Montag. Faber. and Clarisse still rebel against the jurisprudence. Therefore. the authorities creates terrible penalties to be dealt out to bring forth fright in the Rebels so that rebellions would non be staged. One of these penalties is to fire down the rebel’s house and set the occupant in a brainsick refuge. Another. the one Montag fears most. is the mechanical hound. It is made to coerce support from the citizens utilizing the fright that the mechanical hound produces.
Conformity is depicted in Fahrenheit 451 through tuition. amusement. and panic. The people should hold entree to knowledge and should believe with their ain heads. The book shows that holding creativeness and sentiments. like Clarisse. is better than merely being. rather literally. a automaton. Fahrenheit 451 shows the citizens in the fictional society being controlled by foolish instructions. mind-jumbling amusement. and forced fright. Being mindless and obeying is non a pick. Everybody has to hold a point of view of his or her ain in life.
Need Essay Sample?
We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $12.90/page
Conformity vs. Individuality Essay
622 WordsSep 26th, 19993 Pages
"People don't talk about anything...and nobody says anything different from anyone else" This quote, from Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, demonstrates how this fictional society had no individuality, yet they expressed no disprovement of the conformity. To be so simple minded as this civilization was would have eventually lead to self-destruction. To support my theory, recall in the novel when the old lady chose to commit suicide because she did not have freedom. She felt that even though she was "free" she was "enslaved" by the enforcement of limited knowledge.
<br>Without individuality in today's society, the world would be filled with a population of large amounts of followers as opposed to leaders. Do you know where and what this…show more content…
<br>"You like bowling, don't you, Montag?
<br>"Golf is a fine game." As you may have noticed, this society dared not to have different opinions or to disagree. Everyone was predictable and identical, wouldn't that be a "perfect society?" No one disagreeing, no disputes, no wars? I beg to differ because disagreeing and disputing create change. They also allow us to state our opinions as well as to listen to others opinions. After allowing other opinions to be broadcasted, you might identify an error in your opinion which could change your whole outlook on something. Widening your horizons and taking a dip in the sea of "why's" should be an experience we all have the chance in experimenting with.
<br>"Not everyone born free and equal...but everyone made equal. Each man the image of each other." Just imagine sitting in a classroom where everyone acted, talked, and looked the same way. They always agreed and never opposed. Instead of having that individuality and being at one with yourself, and one in the eye's of others, you'd be accounted as a whole. Our country today is not only a "melting pot" of cultures and races, but one of different ideas and knowledge waiting to be served, but if the people are not allowed to eat, then the knowledge is never